So here are the verses I look at to check whether a Bible translation is a good one:

These are mostly in the NT, but with regard to the OT, I don't want a Bible to minimize the phrase "Son of Man" so for me a Bible cannot render "son of man" or even "one like a son of man" in Daniel 7:13 as something like "human being" - that's a paraphrase and while it may convey the correct meaning for SOME OT passages, it does not convey the correct meaning for all of them, and you lose the connection to Jesus' own self-identification as the Son of Man in the NT, especially in Matthew 16:13-15.

Matthew 6:7 - better not say "vain repetition" or imply that repeated prayers are bad - Jesus was criticizing going on and on extemporaneously, not memorized prayers. The word "vain" is nowhere in the Greek!

1 Cor 11:2, and 2 Thess 2:15, 3:6 - better not render the word "teachings" just to avoid the positive connotation for tradition(s), especially if Col 2:8, which has a negative connotation (human traditions) is the only one rendered "tradition" - it's the same Greek word!

Phil 2:6-7 - better not say that he "made himself nothing"

2 Tim 3:16 - better not say that Scripture is "sufficient" as if to imply you don't need tradition or to promote "sola scriptura"

James 5:16 - better not say "fervent prayer" - there is no qualifier in there modifying prayer - the modifier is for the person, it's the prayer of a righteous person that is effective

And the bonus extra credit test verse - any NT passage that talks about the Holy Spirit - even though the pronoun is neuter, that's only because the word PNEUMA is neuter, but the translation should refer to the Holy Spirit as HE, not "it" which depersonalizes the Spirit. And especially Romans 8:28 should say, "the Spirit himself" not "the Spirit itself" or "the same Spirit" or anything like that.

So with all that in mind, I think that this NRSV-2CE may actually be the ONLY Bible translation I know of that gets them all right!