Today I started reading a new book as part of my devotional time - it's a little book that is actually a collection of meditations on Mary from the letters of St. John Henry Newman - the book is called The Mystical Rose
I just started it, so not too much to say yet, no doubt more insights will come from it, but in the introduction, St. JHN makes the distinction between devotion and doctrine (he calls it faith in this context, but he means the content of the faith).
He's famous for clarifying the concept of the development of doctrine, but part of the whole point of that is that there are boundaries on doctrine, and legitimate development can never really be anything new, but rather only the clarification and natural growth of what was there from the beginning.
But, he says, with devotion, there is more freedom for new things to come into the Church, and one of the ways in which Catholicism is rich and robust is in the great number of devotions, and in the great freedom the Church gives to individuals to pick and choose different devotions, according to their taste - and this almost jumped off the page for me - because we would never say that doctrine is a matter of taste, but here he gives us permission to say that devotion IS a matter of taste. Or perhaps it's more accurate to say that it's OK if different personalities gravitate to different devotions.
So the fact that the rosary did not exist in the first 1,000 years of the Church does not mean that it's bad - it was new in the middle ages, but since it is a devotion and not a doctrine, that's ok (though I would argue - and I do argue in the book on prayer - that the rosary is consistent with prayer that was going on from the beginning, and only builds on it).
And now there are so many devotions it would be impossible for any one person to practice them all - and this can seem like a problem for Protestants and new converts - but the point is that it's ok to like some and not others. Some people are devoted to some saints; other people are devoted to different saints. Some people pray the Divine Mercy chaplet; other people are into the Sacred Heart or other similar devotions.
I think it's good to be intentional about what devotions you gravitate to, and not try to do them all - but on the other hand also not give up on them because there are so many. I also think that devotion to Mother Mary, and the rosary should be something everyone does (the rosary at least on occasion).
But in any case, what are your devotional practices? Share if you feel like it (I'll share mine if you share yours), or at least think about them for yourself. Are you still looking to find the right one(s) for you?
I'm back, up and running, and ready to go - I should have a new JOURNEY episode within the next week or so - and because you are my loyal peeps, here is an exclusive, just-for-you, behind the scenes SNEAK PEEK into my new office:
This was for March 24th, recorded for the Ascension App
Thanks for your patience - here is our next installment of The Journey - it's session # 96, but I'm also calling it PART 1 of a "miniseries" on John chapter 6.
Whoever watches it first, please let me know if it looks good or if there are any problems with it - I get through the first two sections of the text on the feeding of the 5,000.
Enjoy!
I mentioned in The Journey that I wrote a song based on Isaiah 2, which is one of my favorite OT passages:
In days to come, the mountain of the Lord’s house
shall be established as the highest mountain, and raised above the hills.
All nations shall stream toward it. Many peoples shall come and say:
“Come, let us go up to the Lord’s mountain, to the house of the God of Jacob, That he may instruct us in his ways, and we may walk in his paths.” For from Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
He shall judge between the nations, and set terms for many peoples.
They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; One nation shall not raise the sword against another, nor shall they train for war again. House of Jacob, come, let us walk in the light of the Lord!
I hope you like the song!
Here is the list of Bible versions I tell my students are UNACCEPTABLE for serious study of the Scriptures and the Early Church - for the most part it's always because these versions of English translations fail my test passages in serious ways - this is a quote from my syllabi:
[Note: The REB, CEB, GNT, KJV/New KJV, and NIV/New NIV versions are NOT adequate translations for the study of Scripture or early Christianity.]
I'd be happy to hear if anyone wants to try to change my mind on any of these, but note that I do not allow (and am constantly fighting against) the ever-popular NIV (which I call the Not Inspired Version).
Next up, I'll re-post a couple of my older videos on this topic...
Here's Matt Walsh's take on it - he says what I'm thinking...
if you watch this, I'd love to hear your thoughts
So here are the verses I look at to check whether a Bible translation is a good one:
These are mostly in the NT, but with regard to the OT, I don't want a Bible to minimize the phrase "Son of Man" so for me a Bible cannot render "son of man" or even "one like a son of man" in Daniel 7:13 as something like "human being" - that's a paraphrase and while it may convey the correct meaning for SOME OT passages, it does not convey the correct meaning for all of them, and you lose the connection to Jesus' own self-identification as the Son of Man in the NT, especially in Matthew 16:13-15.
Matthew 6:7 - better not say "vain repetition" or imply that repeated prayers are bad - Jesus was criticizing going on and on extemporaneously, not memorized prayers. The word "vain" is nowhere in the Greek!
1 Cor 11:2, and 2 Thess 2:15, 3:6 - better not render the word "teachings" just to avoid the positive connotation for tradition(s), especially if Col 2:8, which has a negative connotation (human traditions) is...
